CUNY Big Apple Job Fair
Jacob Javits Center
New York City
April 6, 2000
The vitality of my firm, my city, my state and my country is heavily dependent on the
vitality of our youth.
I firmly believe this premise particularly as it relates to PaineWebber and New York City.
We employ in the city 3,416 people, we compete with no less than ten major firms and in
todayıs society the competition is not about market share but about people and growth.
In an industry that cannot raise prices you must grow or die and in order to grow you
must be able to attract quality employees.
The good news is that our country is approaching full-employment.
The bad news is that our country, in the services sector, is at full employment.
Fully 70% of our services sector is at full employment. Fully 70% of our GDP or
Gross Domestic Product is represented by services. This phenomenon is the true
definition of Alan Greenspanıs recently coined phrase, the wealth effect.
Emerging affluence is creating demand pull for services that are delivered by people
who now have scarcity value, from a research analyst whose compensation has tripled in three
years to an architect who shuns a $500,000 addition in Greenwich because the project
is too small.
Recently I was told by a local contractor that skilled labor is so scarce
that competitive builders will drive up to a job site with a briefcase filled with $100 bills.
They approach a mason or a carpenter, offer them a $2,000 to $5,000 cash bonus upfront
and will increase their current hourly wage by $10.00 an hour if they walk off the job.
Hello $400 a square foot.
Would I suggest that we trade off the wealth effect for a slower economy?
No, and certainly not as president of a major brokerage firm. But I and others will have to
change their traditional perspectives relative to employees if we are to compete in this
decade. Our ability to attract and retain key employees will becomes strategic rather
than tactical in nature. Our ability to understand the "human resource" and what values
they desire from their employers is paramount.
In the past year alone, we have initiated several new human resource policies
not by the way due to my management team's creativity but more so as a response
to the desires of our younger employees. We instituted a business casual dress policy,
changed our pregnancy leave policy, instituted a mentoring program and have established a diversity council that reports directly to me as president.
In the tri-state area, three of every five of tomorrow's replacement employees are
today's minorities. Demography is not subjective it is absolute. White male employees
as a percentage of the U.S. workforce will remain dominant but their numbers will decline
by 4.1% within eight years. African Americans will increase as a percentage by 1.4%,
Asian by 2.7% and those of Hispanic origin will increase by 5.5%. In the past decade our
issues were gender related. No longer. Women already constitute 46 percent of our labor
force and will stabilize at 48 percent. The glass ceilings are beginning to crumble.
Our issues this decade will be two: One, dealing with a much more diverse
employee base as minorities replace the old guard and two, the old guard that doesnıt want
to retire because of extended life spans. We asked Gallop to conduct a poll of investors.
Their findings suggest that the new reality is that after reaching retirement age, the
vast majority of investors 85% expect to continue with some kind of work. Of those who
expect to work, seven out of ten investors say they will work because they want something to
do, not because they think they will need the money. And for non-investors, a stark reality
that they will need to be self-reliant as every corporation moves from defined benefit
to defined contribution pension plans. Think of a society that resembles a barbell
At one end of the barbell is the new, young diverse entrants fueled by the most increase
in births from the late 70's through the early 1990's and from the massive migration to
the United States that started in the 1970s and continues today. At the other end of the
barbell is the fastest growing segment of our population the aging baby boomers from the
late 1940's through the early 1960's, their life expectancy approaching 85 years of age and
with medical advances on the horizon, will live into their 90's. Willard Scott will need
his own show to say happy birthday to those who reach 100 years old.
Are we prepared as a society to deal and manage this demographic shift? Have our managers
been given one minute of training in how to deal with a minority, diverse workforce?
Should we all trade in our ties for a tee- shirt with an AARP logo and discard our socks
and wear loafers so we can as managers fit in. The answers are evolving and they suggest
that we as employers need to be more proactive if we are to survive and/or prosper.
We employers in the New York metropolitan area will be even more at risk as we are the
intermediaries, smack in the center of the greatest inflow of today's minorities and smack
in the center of the most influential financial center of the world. I would like to suggest
that we are intermediaries because of where we are, who we are, and because of the opportunity
that New York City and state represent to our country and the world.
However, as I suggested with my opening premise, the vitality of all of the above will be
directly commensurate with our ability to nurture the vitality of our youth. That is what
got us here in the first place! Those aspiring young immigrants whose succeeding generations
embraced the opportunities that our country and great city afforded them. The new generation
will fulfill the jobs of the new economy and the new generation will be dominated by today's
minorities. We have the human resource here today. Just shift our line of sight from Ellis
Island to The City University of New York. Of the 200,000 CUNY students enrolled
in 1997: 71% were members of minority groups and 62% were women - 200,000 students
who will be in demand, who will be given unprecedented opportunities and choice.
They will be courted by neighboring states and cities and I can assure you by
neighboring competitors.
We as employers must keep them here, inculcate them in our respective firms and prepare
them to inherit, maintain and grow our legacy. They can accelerate our entry into a global
economy as they can speak more than 100 different languages. They can educate us, define
for us and help penetrate the immense economic blocks represented by varying ethnic groups.
They constitute a regional response to the State Department of Labor's report that states
that this year-the year 2000-87% of all jobs will require education beyond high school and
more than half will require a college degree.
They are and will be the predominant human resource that is assimilated into sectors of
the economy demanding educated, intensive work forces. Health services, business services,
social services, engineering, management and related services are expected to account for
half of all wage and salary jobs added to the economy by the year 2006. And if we are
successful at employing and keeping them they will contribute incrementally $700 million a
year more in taxes to New York City and State than what would have been contributed if they
hadn't earned their CUNY degrees.
They are here, waiting for the opportunity that we as employers, taxpayers, mentors and
stated, a wish list for our city and state, ten initiatives that are not about money but
more about managing change.
Having the privilege to serve on the Queens College Foundation Board, as well as the
Business Leadership Council established by our current Chancellor, Matthew Goldstein,
and Chairman Herman Badillo, and also having reviewed Benno Schmidt's report The City
University of New York: An Institution Adrift, I am pleased to have the opportunity
to express a businessmanıs view of the issues facing all of us. I would like to begin
my remarks by establishing a premise that as an individual and a major employer in
New York, I firmly believe: